Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Review: Miss Benson's Beetle

Miss Benson's Beetle Miss Benson's Beetle by Rachel Joyce
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

A quirky Thelma & Louise-type journey, but in the 1950s and they’re searching for a beetle

View all my reviews

Review: The Cherry Robbers

The Cherry Robbers The Cherry Robbers by Sarai Walker
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

An acclaimed artist, living under a false identity, seeks reflection, closure, and control over her family’s past by writing her memoirs in the wake of a reporter seeking to reveal who she really is.

While the language and writing was lovely, there was absolutely no point to this book other than patriarchy, tragedy, and shaming women. It was a long-winded, linear, plotless novel that had the most ridiculous death scenarios and ended without anything being revealed.

The narrator was good, but what a waste of 15 hours.

View all my reviews

Review: The Dictionary of Lost Words

The Dictionary of Lost Words The Dictionary of Lost Words by Pip Williams
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

3.5 stars
A very rich history of the development and publication of the Oxford English Dictionary.

It was slow, plodding, and depressing, but equally fascinating.

Having recently visited Oxford, I enjoyed the geographical element.

View all my reviews

Review: The Soulmate Equation

The Soulmate Equation The Soulmate Equation by Christina Lauren
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

DNA and data combine for a super smart, sexy, modern romance. And likely the funniest best friend character I’ve read in a while. Everyone needs a Fizzy in their lives.

View all my reviews

Sunday, July 24, 2022

Virtual Learning Commons in Public Libraries

As a former public library professional, I witnessed the slow transformation of a library space go from static to dynamic – a space where you walked in, checked out a book, and left – to a space with a teen center, a newly renovated children’s community room, and an adult multi-plex, community collaboratory.

But the equivalent transformation to public library websites, where patrons or students can experience that same sense of interactivity with either library staff or other patrons, was lacking when evaluating public libraries on-line resources.

Under the parameters of the assignment, I spent about an hour assessing three different public library websites – Liverpool Public Library, Liverpool NY (LPL), Central ArkansasLibrary System (CALS), and Fayetteville Public Library, Fayetteville, AR (FPL).  All three libraries have a significant physical collaborative spaces or learning commons: LPL, after a recent renovation, created a Learning Lab, where adults, youth, and children, come to create and collaborate on any number of projects offered by the LPL staff; CALS, a multi-branch system, have collaborative spaces in many of the their branches, from full size teaching kitchens, theaters, tool-repair areas, and entrepreneur-development; FPL has a state-of-the-art Center for Innovation – a multi-million dollar space that includes everything from a photography studio, a fabrication & robotics lab, and video production studio. While all of these are “out of the box” library spaces, all of them require in-person, on-site participation.

So how are these advanced, learning common opportunities reflected virtually on the respective library’s websites? Quite frankly, they are all limited and very similar: All are primarily information seeking options – website links where patrons seek information – not interaction – like checking out books, reserving a meeting space, or finding a database. One significant virtual learning option all three libraries do share is their vast catalog of YouTube® videos. Since the pandemic, when all library services immediately shifted off-line, libraries have quickly and efficiently turned many of their programs into visual learning opportunities, making available normal in-person programming, available to anyone with a computer link. The collective videos in the libraries various channels include a millennium cooking show (seriously – the best “how to make a grilled cheese sandwich” ever), advanced grant writing, and concerts. However, the viewer is still the observer – there’s no collaborative or “common” interactive opportunities to communicate. CALS did sponsor a virtual learning common book club – where participants did have the opportunity to read, discuss, and share as a virtual group, but aside from that, virtual collaboration was limited or non-existent.

The websites I assessed are but three of thousands of library websites. It would take me weeks or months to evaluate them all, but based on this small sample, public libraries have a huge opportunity to create websites that offer patrons a more robust catalog of virtual creating, learning, and collaborative opportunities.